
John Roney (1992) has recently proposed that Chacoan roads functioned to integrate
local Anasazi populations over small areas. This model is based on the scarcity
of road segments longer than a kilometer or two, as well as on the fact
that a Great House or Great Kiva is found at one end of virtually every
road segment associated with the Chaco Anasazi. According to Roney (1992:129), this
pattern suggests that roads must have served functions similar to these
specialized architectural features. By assuming that Great Houses served
to integrate local communities, Roney hypothesizes that the roads functioned
to direct attention, both symbolically and physically, towards this integrative
architecture (Roney 1992:130). In essence, this view sees roads as drawing people from surrounding
areas and funneling them towards a particular Great House.
This model receives considerable support from the road segments found in
the study area. The majority of roads seem to fit both cost-paths and often
direct lines between Great Houses and habitation clusters. In communities
such as Coolidge and Blue J, the segments do not extend beyond community
boundaries, but instead physically link Great Houses with adjacent areas
of relatively dense occupation. In other communities, however, the roads
extend beyond the communities to small hamlets located nearby. For example,
a road segment in Andrews (Figure 5) corresponds
with the cost-path between the community's Great House and a separate cluster
of habitations. In a few cases, however, the fit is only suggestive, such
as the seemingly isolated road segment in Tse Bee Kintsoh that may or may
not have connected one of the Great Houses with a nearby habitation cluster
(Figure 6).
Although the pattern of short road segments emanating from Great Houses
and terminating in nearby habitation clusters is common in the study area,
what this actually signifies is not as clear. In general, scholars investigating
the Chaco Anasazi have seen Great Houses and associated architecture as
serving to integrate communities, and if true, the roads likely served a
similar function as Roney suggests. However, a smaller body of research (Kantner 1996; Sebastian 1992)
suggests that Great Houses may have also been arenas of political competition,
with local political entrepreneurs maintaining the specialized architecture
to impress followers and to upstage potential competitors. From this perspective,
short road segments may have been designed not so much to integrate local
populations, but rather to augment the influence and prestige of local political
leaders. Determining road function in these cases will require archaeological
research focused on the role of Great Houses and Great Kivas in Anasazi
communities.
